Friday 8 March 2013

Construction cursing Vogue trousers 2836

My husband is a terrific sewing supporter. He makes important sewing tools for me (does anyone else have 3 sleeveboards?). Whenever I am dithering about whether to buy fabric, he says, without exception, that I should definitely buy it, even if it is an internet purchase rather than the husband torture of waiting for me in a fabric shop. He is well trained in admiring seam matching and finicky topstitching, and can say "that fits really well" with an appropriate tone of voice.

You would think that when such an exemplary husband hints that he would like me to sew him something, I would jump right to it, but unfortunately this is not the case, as for some reason I find it quite difficult and non rewarding. I needed to read the Yarn Harlot's Portable Love post today, very timely.

Here is some guilt induced sewing, Vogue  2836 trousers that took me 2 whole weeks!

DSC00930

 I am quite sure that the endless hiccups in the construction of these trousers are due to the extremely selfish other side of my brain whispering to me about lovely patterns with frilly bits and colourful fabric. However, the dated cut of this currently in print Vogue pattern may also have something to do with it. Just after I bought this pattern, Vogue released some more men's patterns, and it is about time!

Vogue 2836

My husband will allow only limited measuring. I last measured him in November 2009, for the shirt pattern I use for him, and he felt this was not very long ago, so I had to pin him down with a coffee and breakfast for a waist and hip measurement. I was not allowed any other measurements. I then foolishly bought the pattern via the internet according to his waist measurement, thinking " men's trousers are sold in Australia by waist measurement", but all the Vogue men's patterns are sold by the chest measurement. Oops. I should read the hidden sizing information more carefully. The highest size in the  pattern I had purchased turned out to be one size smaller than my husband's trouser measurements, so I graded up the pattern before making a toile. I now have an unfashionable suit pattern waiting for my 10 year old son to hit a 32" chest measurement, how useful!

The trousers were too big, other than at the waist. Clown pants were mentioned by someone. I regretted my wasted grading work.
I stitched down one of the front pleats and took in all the seams down to the next size, and modified approval of the fitting was granted, after I had raised the back centre seam and lowered the front seam. This convinced me that men's trouser fitting is nearly as horrible a process as women's trouser fitting, as my husband had appeared perfectly happy wearing RTW trousers for the 24 years I have known him.
I then traced out the smaller size trouser pattern, using a double tracing wheel and carbon paper, with the front pleat pleat folded out and the other adjustments, adding to the side seams above the hip and in the waistband.

There are 20 separate pattern pieces for these trousers, including 7 separate pattern pieces for the waistband and 3 for the fly. These are all directional and differently shaped and sized. Naturally I managed to trace out, cut out and interface the waistband  and fly pieces in the opposite, womanly crossing direction.

Personally, I am not bothered by which way my trouser fly laps. On a fabric saving mission (I thought I might get 2 pairs of trousers from the fabric), I sought clarification of the importance of this issue, I was informed in strong terms that a wrongly crossing fly is even worse than a wrongly crossing shirt front, which had previously involved non wearability of the item.

I traced, cut and interfaced these 10 pieces again.

One of the front trouser leg pieces looked strangely thin.
My tracing wheel had failed to impress on one of its wheels in tracing out this leg, and I had erroneously assumed that the missing line was the inner, stitching line.
I traced out and cut the front leg again. Fortunately I had a large piece of my beautiful quality wool fabric, although the 2 trouser plan was looking more precarious by the minute.

I thought longingly of whipping up a t-shirt, but resisted the urge and forged on with the trousers. I learnt some new-to-me, fiddly, but probably useful techniques for slant front pocket application. The instructions have you apply the outer fabric to sections of both the hip side and slant side of the pocket inner, so there is no lining showing if the pocket gapes on sitting down or squatting. This seems an expensive looking, and not too difficult, detail to me. The front and back pocket bags are both finished with french seams, which again seems a nice detail.

After all this pocket love at the front, I decided to follow the Vogue directions for the welt pocket opening at the back. This was a serious mistake, involving quite a bit of ripping out and eventually succumbing to shameful bar tacks at the short ends of the welt. I should have used Ann Rowley's fabulous tutorial as I usually do. Vogue's instructions lacked appropriate measurement information (you know my natural laziness made this attractive, but I have learnt my lesson AGAIN, I must be a slow learner) and have you do really difficult things, such as finishing the entire back inside pocket before making a buttonhole in the seat of the trousers instead of the much easier task of making the buttonhole before you have any interfering fabric in the way. (I did not slavishly follow Vogue in this instance) The illustrations were fuzzy, so that when there were wonderful instructions such as "edgestitch where shown" I had no idea to which area the instructions were referring. After finishing one of the pockets, on the left hand side, I abandoned all idea of a second pocket, as despite Vogue's illustrations showing 2 pockets, in the instructions it kept mentioning  the left side only, and I have seen other men's trousers with a single pocket. I even congratulated myself at doing the "correct" side first. However, this feeling of cleverness was quickly quashed when my husband said he would prefer the single pocket on the right side, as he always uses the right pocket for his wallet. He seemed to think this had something to do with being left handed but I scorned this opinion and may have said something like "no way" when he asked for pocket 2. I was not feeling very compliant at this point. and suggested that he could manage to put his wallet in his pocket with his dominant hand fairly easily.

DSC00928

Despite my travails, I eventually finished the trousers.

DSC00926

Here is evidence of the 7 piece waistband with lots of bias bits and 5 piece fly, which my husband assures me make the trousers more comfortable and sit nicely at the front.  I quite liked the finishing tricks at the waistband - the folded over bias section at the inner base of the waistband is hand stitched to the waistband seam, so that the seam is completely hidden, and also lined by the waistband base. The outer waistband folds over for about 7mm to the inside, which prevents any peeping of the waist lining. The waistband is attached separately to the two back trouser pieces, then finished together with the trouser seat at the centre back seam, which allows for retrofitting. I had seen this before in my husband's more expensive RTW trousers, and find it quite useful for adjustments.

My husband's main criticism of the trousers is that the right belt carrier is too tight. It is the same length as the other carriers, but as it has to hold two layers of belt, I can see the problem. I am also not terribly happy with the topstitching appearance of the dark grey thread I used. This is the same colour as a subtle pinstripe in the black (tropical wool, Michaels Fabrics) fabric, but shows up more than I like in the bartacks. I must get out a permanent marker and fix this little issue in a couture way in keeping with the rest of the construction ;). In restrospect, I am wondering if I should have lined the trousers, as the photographs look rather wrinkly - more so than in real life. If I develop any enthusiasm I may add lining later, but what a waste of my bias bound seams!

Stashbusting, 2.4m (approximate) of tropical wool, purchase 2011, with pocket lining woven polyester from approximately 1999, cotton shirting for waistband lining etc about 2009.

Verdict - Man sewing takes approximately 4x as long as I expect.

 





29 comments:

Andrea said...

Sounds like you have a great hubby. I hope the pants work out eventually. I get tempted sometimes to make pants or shirts for my husband, but then I get over it!

Little Hunting Creek said...

The trousers look really nice. You have reinforced my view that men's trousers should be bought ;)
I will willingly make shirts any time.

Anonymous said...

I've made a couple of pairs of trousers for my hubby, but they didn't have anywhere near this many pieces! Kudos to you for your perseverance! And yeah, I've heard about the putting the laps to the wrong side theory too--I fail to see how it matters. And who is staring so much that they'd notice?!

Sharon said...

Very professional looking trousers and I take my hat off to you making trousers, a shirt maybe but can't see my DH getting custom made trousers.

Joy said...

Oof, that's quite a lot of work for man trousers! They look quite nice in the end. Maybe he'll grow to prefer having a pocket on the left side!

Allison said...

Wow, what a lot of work and a lot of pattern pieces. The end result is great...the trousers look as if they fit really well. I agree...man sewing is very time consuming and not nearly as rewarding as other sewing.

Carolyn said...

Exceptionally professional looking trousers! and I'm joining everyone else in doffing my hat to you! I've never attempted trousers for my husband ;)

katherine h said...

I have had men's trousers idling away in the back of my sewing brain...I'll just dig them down a little deeper after your review!

fabric epiphanies said...

Does your husband run courses in sewing appreciation as I think the demand could be quite high, lol! I have considered making my own husband trousers, but it quickly passes in favour of self gratified sewing. My Dad always used to say, when faced with small mistakes that a blind man would be pleased to see it and I think this is true. What we creative people see as glaringly obvious, the unsewist of us probably do not even notice.

Judith said...

WOW!!! I am hoping my hubbyare isn't secretly reading this blog - don't think I can excel myself like you have...J

BetsyV said...

Those trousers look fantastic! Thanks for hte detailed review of all those pieces. I wondered how that all was going to go together. Did you use the crotch shield?
I was planning to use this pattern, had the jacket muslined, fitted, tried in free fabric - and ditched the idea when the new suit pattern was issued earlier this year. Pleated trousers are not flattering on DH, neither is the oversized/extended shoulders look from the 1980's.
I have the new jacket muslined and fitted and free fabric chosen for the test, but I haven't fit the trousers to him yet.

Meigan said...

I hope your husbands fully appreciates your bravery and perseverance in making these trousers. I am now fully terrified to attempt to make some for my husband! Bravo to you!

Jane M said...

Wow, wonderful results and terrific post detailing your process. He sounds like he deserves this labor of love. My DH has been a rock for me in recent months and I owe him some good sewing time but I think I'll limit mine to a shirt for now.

Ruth said...

These are fabulous. I'm not sure who I should favour more - you, for making these, or your DH for supporting you.

Bernice said...

What a lot of work. They do good on him though which makes all your efforts (almost) worthwhile.

Marie said...

Fantastic results and well done to you. With the pains you have gone through, I am glad they worked out.

SewRuthie said...

Lovely trousers!

Anonymous said...

Wow! Glad my husband doesn't read your blog!

Janine said...

well despite everything the trousers look great ( oh and your son looks incredibly sweet as well - I think even patience for 5 minutes of fabric shopping is impressive for a boy ) I am another one who will not show this post to my husband .

SEWN said...

Wow, you did an amazing job on those pants. They look very professional.

Sue said...

Wow! Super impressed! Love your description of the process. Why don't men think like women though. :)

Summer Flies said...

Very professional looking... I laughed at the 2nd pocket comment and notice there is not a 2nd pocket. You are one brave and very determined woman. All the love to you... I also saw the cute little jacket you knitted for LizaJaneSews... SO CUTE. Very generous.

Steph A said...

Wow! I have to hand it to you, your sewing is truly impressive. The other day I was looking through my copy of David Page Coffin's book Making Trousers for Men and Women, and these look as good as any in the book. Fantastic!

Gabrielle said...

OMG what a complete labour of love! I can't imagine being able to unselfishly see this sort of a project through - after the first few speed humps it'd be a UFO in my house. Congratulations on such fine looking and complicated trousers!

Anonymous said...

Wow you sewed men's work trou! I too take off my hat to you cos I wouldn't have the courage! Or the patience. You stuck with it and what a result. Nicely done.

I have said yes to PJs for JJ. Elastic waist and all. lol.

Gail said...

I hope your husband appreciates these fabulous trousers. They are a work of art and an artful fit!

KID, MD said...

This is why my hubby buys his trousers. They really are 4x the work!! And I think he is far FAR pickier about the ones I sew for him than he is the shop bought pairs. He doesn't care that they fit terribly, he wears them anyway, but the same fit problems in something I made mean they don't get worn. I wonder why I am unmotivated to sew for him. Men!

Unknown said...

Wow, vogue trouser design.I will show this to my mother and ask her to sew this design for me. It was nice reading this post and gave me an idea to save some money. Thanks!

Beth Krncevic said...

You have saved my bacon! And my $59pm wool fabric. Thank you, thank you, thank you. I couldnt remember why I hate Vogue patterns until you prompted me to double check the size. My MOTH is a 36 with a short crotch and leg. I had just spent 4 hours checking, adjusting and rechecking the crotch measrement and was having a cuppa before starting the marathon task of cutting. So glad I read your tale of epic trouser making first. Back to Lincraft to see if I can get the pattrrn in size 42. Why are there so very few patterns for more tailored style menswear? BTW, the back view of your hubby's trousers looks terrific - the most often looked at view from a female perspective, LOL